Evidence, Exhibits & Experts
The "facts of the case" are what the jury is going to believe at the end of the trial. What they believe will depend on the evidence you can get in and keep out. This insightful video and accompanying written material use the Federal Rules of Evidence as a guide.
Comparison of all Evidence courses: Evidence I and II cover how to present evidence at trial, how to get documents in or keep them out. Evidence Exhibits and Experts covers the rules of evidence and how to use them to your advantage.
Click below description to view an excerpt from: Trying Cases to Win, Evidence, Exhibits & Experts that discusses proper authentication and laying a foundation.
Key Points Covered:
- How you can use the rules of evidence to get your evidence admitted
- How you can use the rules of evidence to keep your adversary's evidence out
- What rules you can use to get in evidence that would otherwise be inadmissibile because it's outright hearsay
- How you can make your evidence uncross-examinable
- How to use the rules of evidence to develop deposition strategies
Detailed Course Outline
DISK 1
- The importance of using the rules correctly
- Rule 401 - Relevant evidence admissible
- Rule 402 - Irrelevant evidence inadmissible
- Rule 106 - The rule of completeness
- Rule 104(a) - Questions of admissibility generally
- Rule 104(b) - Relevancy Conditioned on Fact
- Rule 802 - Hearsay not admissible
- DOOR OPENERS - THE 803 SERIES
- Rule 803 - Hearsay Exception
- Rule 803(2) - Excited Utterances
- Rule 602 - Lack of personal knowledge
- Rule 803(1) - Present sense impression
- Rule 803(4) - Statements for purposes of medical diagnosis or treatment
- Rule 803(3) - Then existing mental, emotional or physical conditions
- Rule 803(8) - Public records and reports
- Rule 803(5) - Recorded recollection
- Rule 803(6) - Records of regularly conducted activity
- LAYING A FOUNDATION
- Rule 901(a) - Requirement of authentication and identification general provision
- Rule 901(b) - Requirement of authentication and illustrations
- Rule 901(B)(1) - Testimony of witness with knowledge Exhibits at Trial Edmundson v. Officers
- Roe, Dow, & Moe case file
- Video Demonstration by Marietta Robinson
DISK 2
- Exhibits at trial, Edmundson Case, continued demonstration voir dire of the witness by Mike Fontham opposing the offer of the photograph into evidence
- Rule 901(b)(4) - Illustrations - Distinctive Characteristics and the like
- Rule 406 - Habit & custom
- DOOR OPENERS - RULE 801 STATEMENTS WHICH ARE NOT HEARSAY
- Rule 801(d)(1) and 801(d)(2)
- Rule 801(d)(1)(A) - Prior statement by witness - inconsistent with testimony
- Rule 105 - Limited admissibility
- Rule 801(d)(1)(B) - Prior statement by witness - consistent with testimony
- Impact of this rule on strategy for taking deposition of witness
- Rule 801(d)(1)(C) - Prior statement by witness - identification
- Rule 801(d)(2)(A) - Admission by party-opponent - Party's own statement
- Impact of rule for strategies for depositions of adverse parties
- Rule 801(d)(2)(B) - Admission by Party-opponent - adoption
- Rule 801(d)(2)(e) - Admission by party-opponent - authorized
- Rule 408 - Compromise and offers to compromise
- Rule 801(d)(2)(D) - Admission by party-opponent - Statements by agents of parties
- Rule 801(d)(2)(E) - Admission by Party-opponent - Co-conspirator
- Rule 806 - Attacking and supporting credibility of declarant
- Rule 805 - Hearsay within hearsay: the "totem pole rule"
- DOOR OPENERS - THE 804 SERIES
- Rule 804(a) - Definition of unavailability
- Rule 804(b) - Hearsay Exceptions
- Rule 804(b)(2) - Hearsay Exceptions - Statement under belief of impending death
- Rule 804(b)(3) - Hearsay Exceptions - Statement against interest
- Rule 804(5), 803(24) - The catchall exceptions
- DOOR CLOSERS
- Rule 403 - Exclusion of relevant evidence on grounds of prejudice, confusion, or waste of time
- Rule 407 - Subsequent Remedial Measures
- Rule 602 - Lack of Personal Knowledge
- People v. Boland - Applying the rules of evidence to a case file
DISK 3
- General Review of how to use the rules
- Rule 105 - Limited admissibility
- How to use the rules to protect your case for appeal
- Rule 804(B)(1) - Use of prior testimony in unrelated cases
- MOTIONS IN LIMINE
- Rule 104(c) - Preliminary questions - hearing of jury
- Rule 103(c) - Rulings on evidence - hearing of jury
- Rule 103(a)(1) - Rulings on evidence, effect of erroneous ruling - objection
- Rule 103(a)(2) - Rulings on evidence, effect of erroneous ruling - offer of proof
- EXPERTS AT TRIAL
- Fromer v. Wilson - analysis of case file and application of the rules of evidence
- 700 Series - Opinions & expert testimony
- Rule 701 - Opinion testimony by lay witnesses
- Rule 702 - Testimony by experts
- Rule 704 - Opinion on ultimate issue
- Rule 703 - Basis for the expert's opinion
- Video demonstration - Motions in limine, stipulation and opening statements in Fromer v. Wilson
DISK 4
- Video Demonstrations: Direct & Cross-examination of dentist expert in Fromer v. Wilson
- Use of the 700 series - opinions of experts
- Direct examination of expert witness - How to lead with out leading
- Video demonstration: Cross-examination of an expert witness
- Impeaching the expert witness - use of rule 613(a)
Viewing Time: 6 hours